|
||||
|
Bank management teams across the country are still asking the same
question today. Only now we have a name for it, we call it Interest Rate
Risk. We also have better ways to measure and monitor it, thanks to the
increased availability of data and more powerful technology. The most significant change occurred in mid-term rates (those rates
between 1 and 10 years). Mid-term rates went from an average of 4.08% down
to 2.22%, a change of over 180bp. Long-term rates moved in a similar
fashion, moving from an average of 5.55% down to 4.30%, a shift down of
125bp. Movements on the short end of the curve were much closer to the
change in fed funds with short-term rates dropping 81bp from 1.89% down to
1.09%. In March 2003 the FDIC reported that “the average net interest margin…was 3.80 percent, 26 basis points lower than a year earlier. Among institutions with less than $100 million in assets…the average net interest margin has fallen by 7 basis points in the last four quarters; at larger institutions, the margin decline over this period has averaged 27 basis points.” This downward pressure continued into June for larger banks. The average margin fell from 3.79 down to 3.72. The FDIC also reported that, “more than half of all institutions – 51.4% - saw their net interest margin decline in the second quarter.” Back to the original question One of the best ways to learn how changing rates will affect net interest margin is to use an interest rate risk (IRR) model like A/L BENCHMARKS. Models like this typically measure IRR by examining Net Interest Earnings at Risk (a.k.a. Margin at Risk, see side bar for an explanation). The goal of such a process is to predict what percentage changes in margin will occur as a result of either an increase or a decrease in market interest rates. Rewind Peer data from one year ago (June 30, 2002) showed that banks with less than $100 million in total assets had 1.5% of their margin at risk given a rate shock down. This equates to a decrease of about 6 ½ basis points if rates fall. Larger banks showed a decrease of 3.9%, or 16 basis points, given a rate shock down. These numbers seem consistent with the actual industry performance reported by the FDIC (see table for a comparison). The FDIC also reported that roughly half (51.4%) of all banks showed a
decline in net interest margin from March 31, 2003 to June 30, 2003. Again
this seems consistent with what the A/L BENCHMARKS peer data predicted last
quarter. The March 31, 2003 peer data showed that 3319 banks out of 6114
(54.3%) were exposed to falling rates. Such results show that the A/L
BENCHMARKS model, and its peer data, can reasonably project what will happen
to a bank’s margin when market rates change. The graph shows the average spread between the long and short points on the yield curve from March 1989 until June 2003. The average spread over that time frame was 2.37%. The spread as of June 2003 was 3.61% down from 3.80% in March. This data might suggest that the curve is still too steep. If that’s the case long rates must come down (again) or short rates must rise. On the other hand, perhaps this data only tells us what we already know, that market interest rates will change. What will happen to your bank’s interest margin when market rates change? Are you positioned to take advantage of rising rates? The June 30, 2003 peer data suggests that over 50% of all banks are. The data and tools you need to manage your margin are available. Is your IRR model accurately telling you what to anticipate? |
|
This
A/L BENCHMARKS Industry Report article was published |